Abstract

Atmospheric acidity is increasingly determined by carbon dioxide and organic acids1–3. Among the latter, formic acid facilitates the nucleation of cloud droplets4 and contributes to the acidity of clouds and rainwater1,5. At present, chemistry–climate models greatly underestimate the atmospheric burden of formic acid, because key processes related to its sources and sinks remain poorly understood2,6–9. Here we present atmospheric chamber experiments that show that formaldehyde is efficiently converted to gaseous formic acid via a multiphase pathway that involves its hydrated form, methanediol. In warm cloud droplets, methanediol undergoes fast outgassing but slow dehydration. Using a chemistry–climate model, we estimate that the gas-phase oxidation of methanediol produces up to four times more formic acid than all other known chemical sources combined. Our findings reconcile model predictions and measurements of formic acid abundance. The additional formic acid burden increases atmospheric acidity by reducing the pH of clouds and rainwater by up to 0.3. The diol mechanism presented here probably applies to other aldehydes and may help to explain the high atmospheric levels of other organic acids that affect aerosol growth and cloud evolution.

Highlights

  • We use the global chemistry–climate model ECHAM5/MESSy11 (EMAC) to simulate atmospheric HCOOH abundance

  • Recent studies have proposed several missing sources to explain the model underprediction. These include locally enhanced emissions of HCOOH and its precursors, and updated or tentative chemical pathways that involve a broad range of precursors, primarily of biogenic origin[6,9,12,14]

  • We provide evidence that methanediol reaction with OH in the gas phase quantitatively yields HCOOH under atmospheric conditions (Fig. 2)

Read more

Summary

Check for updates

Using Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI)/Metop-A satellite column measurements[13] to determine the HCOOH burden (Methods), EMAC(base) illustrates the issue (Fig. 1a, b): the model globally underpredicts the satellite columns by a factor of 2–5. Similar biases relative to ground-based Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) columns are observed at several latitudes (Extended Data Fig. 1) These persistent discrepancies point to substantial unidentified sources of atmospheric HCOOH. Recent studies have proposed several missing sources to explain the model underprediction These include locally enhanced emissions of HCOOH and its precursors, and updated or tentative chemical pathways that involve a broad range of precursors, primarily of biogenic origin[6,9,12,14].

Article a IASI b
Wet and dry deposition
Dry deposition
Online content
Methods
Findings
Code availability
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call