Abstract

BackgroundThe misuse of conscientious objection (CO) is a significant barrier to legal abortion access in many countries, especially in Latin America. We examine the reasons for denial of legal abortion services in Mexico and Bolivia and identify ways to mitigate the misuse of CO.MethodsWe conducted 34 in-depth interviews and 12 focus group discussions in two states in Mexico and four departments in Bolivia. Results were coded and categorized using a thematic analysis approach.ResultsDenial of abortion services based on CO is widespread in health facilities in Mexico and Bolivia and is primarily employed for reasons other than moral, religious, or ethical considerations. The main reasons for denial of services based on CO is lack of knowledge about abortion-related laws and fear of legal problems in abortion service provision. Conversely, the main reason to provide services is to comply with relevant laws. Denying services under the guise of CO negatively impacts pregnant people and health care teams, including fewer safe abortion options and increased workload and stigma, respectively. Most respondents cited training and education on abortion law as the foremost way to mitigate the negative impacts of the misuse of CO.ConclusionsFor many health personnel, knowing, understanding, and following the law is reason enough to provide abortion services. Individuals who object due to lack of knowledge about laws and fear of legal problems represent a key population that can be sensitized and equipped with the necessary information and resources to provide legal abortion services.

Highlights

  • The misuse of conscientious objection (CO) is a significant barrier to legal abortion access in many countries, especially in Latin America

  • We found that the main reasons for denial of services based on CO among our sample is lack of knowledge about abortion-related laws and fear of legal problems in abortion service provision

  • Our analysis reveals that, according to respondents, conscientious objection (CO) is widespread across public hospitals providing legal abortion services in Mexico and Bolivia; there is a lack of consensus regarding the pervasiveness of denial of abortion services more broadly

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The misuse of conscientious objection (CO) is a significant barrier to legal abortion access in many countries, especially in Latin America. Studies have shown that in some settings providers invoke CO to refuse to provide legal abortion services, when in reality, their objection is based on misunderstanding and misinformation, lack of trust in the person requesting abortion services, fear of police harassment or legal punishment, peer pressure or broader social stigma, and/or economic gain. Such a range of rationales makes CO a complex issue [4, 6,7,8]. Due to differences in methodologies between the three countries, results from South Africa will be published separately

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call