Abstract

While urban divisions are commonly emphasized in urban studies, there has been less emphasis on reproductions and contestations of divides within marginal urban spaces. This paper explores the dynamics of juxtaposed differences related to housing and urban citizenship in Delft, Cape Town. Delft is a microcosm of thirty years of official housing interventions in post-apartheid South Africa. It is also a space in which differences of urban formality and informality and of permanence and temporariness co-exist, and where housing is at the centre of community politics. This is driven by residents’ perceptions, interpretations and negotiations of differentiated housing rights and opportunities, residential categories and identities and notions of belonging. A particular manifestation of juxtaposed material and temporal differences in housing infrastructure is the construction of temporary relocation areas (TRAs). The multifaceted challenges with the TRAs in Delft illustrate the political nature of housing infrastructure as reported by (Lemanski 2019a, b) and how citizen-making is shaped in and through articulations of formality and informality, and of permanence and temporariness. This informs a politics of citizenship where the precariousness of permanent temporariness as reported by (Yiftachel 2009) for those living in the TRAs is set against those whose right to secure housing is realized, giving them recognition and permanence as ‘proper’ citizens. These dynamics may simultaneously inform rights-based claims to citizenship through collective struggles and individual actions, and localized forms of exclusion from the project of citizenship.

Highlights

  • This paper explores the dynamics between juxtaposed material and temporal differences of housing and how these inform urban citizenship within Delft, a poor urban community in Cape Town, South Africa

  • Housing and homeownership are central to the project of citizenship in South Africa both in state policies from above, and to the claims to and contestations over housing rights and what a proper house should be from below

  • A central notion running through these dynamics is a perception of the centrality of the house in order to be included in the project of urban citizenship

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This paper explores the dynamics between juxtaposed material and temporal differences of housing and how these inform urban citizenship within Delft, a poor urban community in Cape Town, South Africa. Infrastructure in the post-apartheid city is material, but deeply political and imbricated with democratic politics and citizenship (Amin and Cirolia 2018; Lemanski 2019a, b) Exploring this politics in Delft reveals how multiple formulations of urban citizenship may emerge and are entangled in complex and sometimes conflicting ways (Millstein 2017). It is a place where many residents are living in informal and temporary situations and are waiting and hoping to become homeowners through state-delivered permanent housing These juxtaposed material and temporal differences in housing are a lens through which to explore multiple articulations of urban citizenship, and their entanglements, contestations and (re)productions. The politics of citizenship emerging from the juxtaposed differences of materialities and temporalities of housing include the whole spectre of collective and individual strategies and practices

Housing and Infrastructural Citizenship in South Africa
Housing and Urban Citizenship in Delft
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call