Abstract

Although dietary α-linolenic acid (ALA) or linolenic acid (LA) intake was reported to be epidemiologically associated with a lower prevalence of hypertension, recent clinical trials have yielded conflicting results. Comparable experimental evidence for the roles of these two different fatty acids is still lacking and the underlying mechanisms need to be further elucidated. Our data showed that ALA but not LA supplementation alleviated systolic blood pressure elevation and improved ACh-induced, endothelium-dependent vasodilation in both spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs) and AngII-induced hypertensive mice. In addition, SHRs displayed reduced vascular Sirtuin 3 (SIRT3) expression, subsequent superoxide dismutase 2 (SOD2) hyperacetylation and mitochondrial ROS overproduction, all of which were ameliorated by ALA but not LA supplementation. In primary cultured endothelial cells, ALA treatment directly inhibited SIRT3 reduction, SOD2 hyperacetylation, mitochondrial ROS overproduction and alleviated autophagic flux impairment induced by AngII plus TNFα treatment. However, these beneficial effects of ALA were completely blocked by silencing SIRT3. Restoration of autophagic flux by rapamycin also inhibited mitochondrial ROS overproduction in endothelial cells exposed to AngII plus TNFα. More interestingly, SIRT3 KO mice developed severe hypertension in response to a low dose of AngII infusion, while ALA supplementation lost its anti-hypertensive and endothelium-protective effects on these mice. Our findings suggest that ALA but not LA supplementation improves endothelial dysfunction and diminishes experimental hypertension by rescuing SIRT3 impairment to restore autophagic flux and mitochondrial redox balance in endothelial cells.

Highlights

  • As the leading risk factor for cardiovascular disease, hypertension has become the most prevalent chronic disease, affecting more than 30% of adults aged ≥25 years worldwide[1]

  • In order to clarify the potential beneficial effects of diets enriched with n-3 or n-6 PUFAs on spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs), four-week-old male SHRs were respectively fed with the control diet, linolenic acid (LA)-supplemented diet or ALA-supplemented diet for 8 weeks

  • Our findings suggest that ALA but not LA supplementation rescues Sirtuin 3 (SIRT3) reduction, improves endothelial dysfunction and reduces blood pressure elevation in hypertensive animals, providing the proof of principle for the benefits of dietary ALA intake against hypertension

Read more

Summary

Introduction

As the leading risk factor for cardiovascular disease, hypertension has become the most prevalent chronic disease, affecting more than 30% of adults aged ≥25 years worldwide[1]. As a plant-derived omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (n-3 PUFA), α-linolenic acid (ALA) is abundant in nuts, leafy vegetables and plant seed oils, such as rapeseed, soyabean and flaxseed oils[3,4]. Dietary ALA intake was reported to be epidemiologically associated with a lower prevalence of hypertension, and ALA has been indicated as a promising alternative addition to available lifestyle medications for the prevention of cardiovascular diseases[5,6]. Official journal of the Cell Death Differentiation Association. Li et al Cell Death and Disease (2020)11:83 they are precursors for pro-inflammatory eicosanoids[7]. A recent epidemiological study reported that higher plasma levels of n-6 PUFA linolenic acid (LA) were significantly associated with a lower prevalence of hypertension[8]. Comparative data and strong experimental evidence are urged to draw a conclusion about the effects of both dietary n-3 and n-6 PUFAs on hypertension

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call