Abstract

In a unanimous decision in Lingle v. Chevron (544 U.S._), released May 23, the U.S. Supreme Court provided resounding support for the position advocated by APA and others concerned about this regulatory takings case. The Court concluded that the Agins “substantially advances” test, which has added so much confusion in takings analysis, is clearly inappropriate.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call