Abstract
In his Editorial “NIH Basics” (3 August, p. [503][1]), F. S. Collins cites several impressive research accomplishments to exemplify the outstanding benefits of support for basic research. It would be valuable to know when these research achievements occurred and what the level of basic research funding was at those times. In addition, a graph of the amount of funding for translational research compared with basic research over the past three decades would illustrate the overall and unusual shift in U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) funds. During the senior Bush presidential era, I had the privilege of testifying to a House committee on NIH and National Science Foundation funding. Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi asked pointedly whether the United States was still number one with respect to its basic research position in the world. I answered yes. However, other nations are increasing their basic research funding. If asked the question again today, the rapid movement by NIH to translational funding might require me to change my answer. [1]: /lookup/doi/10.1126/science.1227820
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
