Abstract
Abstract: the recent increased scrutiny by the authorised authorities of compliance with the legislation on foreign investment in strategic economic companies has generated a significant number of legal disputes in this area. In this case, both in theory and in practice, there are difficulties in identifying the types of claims brought by the Federal Antimonopoly Service in order to eliminate the illegally established control of foreign investors over strategic business entities. This hinders the proper establishment of jurisdiction, subject of proof, choice of means of proof, determination of consequences of the claim, etc. The authors propose a classification of the said claims based on the criteria most recognised in the legal doctrine and provide recommendations on its application in order to prevent miscarriages of justice.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
