Abstract

Abstract. In this paper, we present the type synthesis of freedom and constraint elements for design of general flexure mechanisms. As an important step in the conceptual design stage, the goal of type synthesis is to qualitatively determine the topology or connectivity of flexure elements and rigid bodies in a mechanism. The synthesis procedure presented here is based on a recently emerging screw theory based approach for flexure mechanisms. We first categorize a list of commonly used atomic flexure primitives including blades, wires, notches and bellow springs etc. We then derive their twist and wrench matrices that mathematically represent their freedom and constraint spaces. The synthesis procedure rigorously follows screw algebra. Freedom elements including R-joints and P-joints are defined as basic motion elements that allow a single rotation or a single translation. By using parallel structures of these flexure primitives, eleven designs of R-joints and eight designs of P-joints are systematically synthesized. As a duality, constraint elements including P-constraints and R-constraints remove a single translation or rotation. In contract to freedom elements, we synthesized serial chains of flexure primitives and obtained six designs of P-constraints and three designs of R-constraints. These freedom and constraint elements form a catalogue of basic building blocks for designing more complex flexure mechanisms. At last we utilize four design examples to demonstrate how to synthesize hybrid structures with serial and parallel combination of these elements.

Highlights

  • Compliant mechanisms (Howell, 2001) or flexure mechanisms (Smith, 2000; Smith and Chetwynd, 1992), formed by a set of rigid bodies connected with compliant elements, produce a defined motion through elastic deformation of their compliant elements

  • In a recent conference tutorial by Henein (2011), the author enumerated a list of flexure bearing designs based on their degree of freedom (DOF), Grubler mobility and degree of hyperstaticity (DOH)

  • Many authors have attempted to systemize the constraint based approach. This approach has been further formalized into the Freedom and Constraint Topology (FACT) framework (Hopkins, 2007a; Hopkins and Culpepper, 2010a,b)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Compliant mechanisms (Howell, 2001) or flexure mechanisms (Smith, 2000; Smith and Chetwynd, 1992), formed by a set of rigid bodies connected with compliant elements, produce a defined motion through elastic deformation of their compliant elements. The constraint-based design approach and the FACT approach are mathematically equivalent to screw theory (Ball, 1998; Hunt, 1978; Phillips, 1984, 1990; Davidson and Hunt, 2004) that has been widely used in kinematics community for various problems such as type synthesis of parallel mechanisms (Kong and Gosselin, 2010) and mobility analysis of rigid body mechanisms (Huang et al, 2008). In recognizing this intrinsic connection between the constraint based approach and screw theory, a series of work (Su et al, 2009; Su and Tari, 2010, 2011; Hopkins and Culpepper, 2010c; Yu et al, 2010; Su, 2011) on screw theory based approach for type synthesis and analysis of flexure mechanisms have been done. At last these freedom and constraint elements are used for constructing more complex flexure mechanisms

Twists and wrenches
Coordinate transformation of twists and wrenches
Flexure primitives
Commonly used flexure primitives
Serial chains of flexure primitives
Parallel chains of flexure primitives
Case 6: Bs-B-S
Case 9: Bs-4W
Synthesis of P-Joints T P
Case 1
Case 3
Case 4
Case 5
Case 6
Case 7
Synthesis of P-constraints W P
Case 2
Hybrid designs of joints and constraints
Conclusions
Synthesis of parallel chains with constraint elements
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call