Abstract

The design of an optimum spacing between oil wells entails both reservoir characterization and economics considerations. High hydrocarbon recovery requires short distances between wells. However, higher well density leads to a greater development cost. Accordingly, determination of an optimum well spacing is primordial in the development of oil fields. As a matter of fact, the identification of optimum well spacing for heterogeneous sandstone reservoirs undergoing waterflooding requires extensive analytical and numerical studies. The intent of this work is therefore to develop type curves as a quick tool in estimating ultimate recovery and reduce excessive reservoir simulation cost in analog reservoirs. These type curves utilize reservoir heterogeneity and well spacing in the estimating of oil recovery. In this work, we investigated numerically the effects of heterogeneity and well spacing on ultimate recovery using Eclipse black oil simulation and PEEP economic software 2015 and 2009 versions, respectively. The study involved a 50-ft thick Middle Eastern reservoir with porosity variability ranging from 0.2 to 0.9. Corresponding average matrix permeabilities of 1, 10 and 100 md were considered. Type curves relating well spacing and heterogeneity to ultimate oil recovery were developed. Type curves and net present value calculations indicated that there is exists an ultimate well spacing for each of the considered matrix permeabilities.

Highlights

  • Proper distribution of wells in a reservoir undergoing waterflooding leads to both low cost and high sweep efficiency, which yields higher recovery

  • We investigated numerically the effects of heterogeneity and well spacing on ultimate recovery using Eclipse black oil simulation and PEEP economic software 2015 and 2009 versions, respectively

  • In order to study the effects of heterogeneity on oil recovery, permeability was generated from porosity measurements (Figures 1-3)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Proper distribution of wells in a reservoir undergoing waterflooding leads to both low cost and high sweep efficiency, which yields higher recovery. Well spacing is defined as the acreage of the productive area divided by the total number of wells in the same area presented in terms of acres/well. Well spacing has been the main concern for the industry for many years. Laughlin, and Lardon [1] investigated well spacing and looked at the effect of oil recovery by injecting water. A decrease in well spacing from 40 to 20 acres can increase the recovery by up to 9%

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call