Abstract
ObjectivesTo report the outcomes of patients who underwent Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis (Kpro) surgery at the University Health Network (Toronto, Ont.) and the University of Ottawa Eye Institute (Ottawa, Ont.) between June 2008 and July 2013. DesignRetrospective case series. ParticipantsForty-four eyes of 43 patients who underwent Kpro surgery. MethodsA retrospective review was conducted of all Kpro procedures performed by 4 attending cornea surgeons. The preoperative characteristics and postoperative course of each patient were analyzed. ResultsIn 31 eyes (70%), the primary indication for a Kpro was failed corneal transplantation. The remaining 13 eyes (30%) had Kpro as a primary procedure. In all eyes, preoperative visual acuity (VA) was 20/150 or worse, with 39 eyes (89%) having a VA of counting fingers, hand movement, or light perception. Mean follow-up time was 21 ± 12 months (range 12–57 months). The retention rate at the last follow-up was 95%. Best-achieved median VA was 20/100 (range 20/20 to no light perception [NLP]), with 37% of patients achieving a VA of >20/40 at some point during their postoperative course. At the last follow-up, median VA was 20/400 (range 20/30 to NLP). The 2 most common complications included retroprosthetic membrane formation (23 eyes, 52%) and elevated intraocular pressure (10 eyes, 23%). There were 5 cases (11%) of stromal melt and 1 case (2%) of infective keratitis. ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that Kpro improves VA in a majority of cases, and is a viable option in situations in which there is a poor prognosis for traditional penetrating keratoplasty.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology/Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.