Abstract

ObjectiveTo determine if the early response assessments can predict the long-term efficacy of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment for macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO-ME).MethodsA retrospective study of patients with diagnosis of RVO-ME and intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment was conducted. Clinical characteristics including age, gender, disease subtype and disease duration were recorded at baseline. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA and logMAR), intraocular pressure (IOP), and central macular thickness (CMT) were recorded at baseline, 2 weeks, and every month (months 1–6) after injection. Further, we compared the early response assessments between the cured group (6-month CMT ≤ 250 μm) and the uncured group (6-month CMT > 250 μm).ResultsA total of 164 eyes in 164 patients (77 male and 87 female) were included. At each post-injection time point, both BCVA and CMT are significantly decreased from baseline (all P < 0.001). Spearman’s test showed that 2-week CMT reduction rate after the first injection was negatively correlated with BCVA at 6 months (r = −0.359, P < 0.001). Compared with the uncured group (47 cases), the cured group (117 cases) was younger (59.53 ± 11.68 vs. 65.19 ± 13.10 years old, P < 0.01), had more BRVO patients (76.1% vs. 44.7%, P < 0.01), a shorter disease duration (1.92 ± 2.43 vs. 5.05 ± 4.32 months, P < 0.01), lower baseline CMT (527.09 ± 154.95 vs. 768.96 ± 287.75 μm, P < 0.01), and lower baseline BCVA (0.86 ± 0.44 vs. 1.31 ± 0.51, P < 0.01). At each post-injection time point, the cured group had lower CMT and BCVA values when compared to the uncured group (all P < 0.01), and the 2-week CMT reduction rate was identified as the earliest response time to predict the long-term treatment efficacy. Moreover, ROC curve analysis indicated that a 2-week CMT reduction rate >37% yielded the best cut-off point for predicting the long-term cure of anti-VEGF treatment at 6 months (P < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression confirmed that the 2-week CMT reduction rate >37% was independently associated with the 6-month cured rate (OR = 9.639, 95% Cl = 1.030–90.227, P = 0.047).ConclusionAge, disease duration, baseline CMT, and baseline BCVA are associated with visual outcomes at 6-month of anti-VEGF treatment for RVO-ME. The “2-week CMT reduction rate >37%” after the first injection is an independent factor to predict better long-term outcomes.

Highlights

  • Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is the second most blinded retinal vascular disease in the world [1], which is characterized with the blockage of small veins that carries blood away from the retina

  • A total of 110 patients were diagnosed with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO), and 54 patients were diagnosed with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO)

  • The results revealed that the 2-week central macular thickness (CMT) reduction rate >37% after the first injection was the best predictor for the cure at 6 months (OR = 9.639, 95% Cl = 1.030–90.227, P = 0.047)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is the second most blinded retinal vascular disease in the world [1], which is characterized with the blockage of small veins that carries blood away from the retina. This blockage is often associated with the hardening of arteries (such as atherosclerosis) and the formation of a blood clot [2]. Recent RVO guidelines have recommend intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF drugs as the first-line treatment for RVO-ME, due to its ability to inhibit angiogenesis, reduce vascular permeability, relieve inflammation, reducing central macular thickness (CMT) and ME [6–8]. Some patients continue to have ME or relapse after repeated injection in clinic practice, namely refractory ME, which requires long-term, repeated, and combined treatment [9, 10]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.