Two-Stage Endovascular Aneurysm Repair with Preemptive Embolization: A Retrospective Study

Abstract

ObjectiveType II endoleak is the most common complication of endovascular aneurysm repair. Retrograde perfusion from the aneurysmal sac side branch to the aneurysmal sac, including the inferior mesenteric artery and lumbar arteries, is associated with adverse events after endovascular aneurysm repair, such as aneurysm sac enlargement, reintervention, rupture, and abdominal aortic aneurysm-related death. Preemptive embolization of the aneurysmal sac side branch before endovascular aneurysm repair is an effective and safe procedure for preventing type II endoleak and reducing the size of the aneurysmal sac. Since 2019, we have been conducting preemptive embolization of the inferior mesenteric artery and lumbar arteries. Thus, we intended to work on a two-stage endovascular aneurysm repair in which embolization and endovascular aneurysm repair are performed on separate days, owing to concerns about prolonged operative time and increased contrast media use and radiation exposure from performing endovascular aneurysm repair simultaneously. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a two-stage endovascular aneurysm repair. MethodsThis retrospective study included 114 cases of endovascular aneurysm repair (95 men and 19 women) for AAA performed at our hospital between January 2019 and December 2022. Inferior mesenteric artery and lumbar artery embolization were performed simultaneously with endovascular aneurysm repair (simultaneous group) in 49 cases, and two-stage embolization was performed (two-stage group) in 30 cases. The primary endpoints included the occurrence of T2EL during follow-up and the embolization rate of the IMA or LAs. ResultsType II endoleak did not occur in the two-stage group(follow-up period;35±6.2 months), whereas it was observed in 8.2% of patients more than 6 months after EVAR in the simultaneous group(follow-up period;28±5.5months). While the total operative time was 340 ± 111.2 min in the simultaneous group, the durations for embolization and endovascular aneurysm repair in the two-stage group were 169 ± 35.5 min and 135.0 ± 26.4 min (total time 304 ± 31.2 min, p=0.21), respectively, indicating a reduction in the total time required for the two techniques. The total amounts of contrast media used in the simultaneous and two-stage groups were 200.0 ± 179.2 mL and 182.0 ± 51.2 mL(p=0.42), respectively, and the corresponding total radiation doses were 2502.4 ± 690.5 mGy and 2114.6 ± 351.2 mGy (p=0.28), respectively, showing a decrease in both in the two-stage group. The lumbar artery embolization rates were 74.3% and 87.9% (p<0.01) in the simultaneous and two-stage groups, respectively, indicating a significant difference. ConclusionsTwo-stage endovascular aneurysm repair with preemptive embolization of the inferior mesenteric artery and lumbar arteries may be an effective strategy for reducing type II endoleak occurrence, overall operative time, contrast use, and overall radiation exposure.