Abstract
Advertisement recommendation service provides consumers with relevant product information and plays a guiding role when consumers search and buy products. However, some misleading advertisements are recommended to consumers for purpose of stimulating their purchasing desire. This paper investigates a problem in the field of two-stage advertisement recommendation service regulation, and a tripartite game model is established to analyze the relationship among the government, the rent-seeking platform, and the misleading advertiser. In addition, we explore the government supervision strategies and examine the effects of the penalty on the probability of publishing misleading advertisements. Then we further discuss how supervision costs and speculation profits impact the probably of supervision and rent-seeking separately. Moreover, numerical examples are given to validate the correctness of the conclusion. Finally, the article proposes some related suggestions for improving advertisement recommendation service regulation, thus offer feasible countermeasures to current government supervisory policy.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.