Abstract

There is little information on the efficacy and profitability of two-pass weed control strategies in soybean when a preemergence (PRE) residual herbicide is followed by glyphosate applied late postemergence (LPOST) under Ontario, Canada environmental conditions. Ten field trials were conducted during 2011-2013 in Ontario, Canada to determine the level of weed control, yield and net returns of various preemergence/postemergence programs in glyphosate-resistant soybean. Crop injury was 2% or less with the herbicides evaluated except for chlorimuron + flumioxazin (PRE) and pyroxasulfone + flumioxazin (PRE) which caused 4% and 7% visible injury in soybean, respectively. A single application of glyphosate resulted in variable weed control (73% - 98%) while the sequential application of glyphosate provided excellent weed control (98% - 100%). The control of all weeds 8 WAA after the LPOST glyphosate application was equivalent regardless of the PRE herbicide applied (96% - 100%). Soybean yield was equivalent to the weed free control regardless of the PRE herbicide applied. Soybean yield was lower than the sequential application of glyphosate with chlorimuron or pyroxasulfone/flumioxazin PRE fb glyphosate LPOST. Generally net return with the two-pass programs was equivalent to the sequential application of glyphosate. Net returns were lower than the sequential application of glyphosate with chlorimuron or s-metolachlor + flumetsulam followed by glyphosate LPOST. Based on these results, a sequential application of glyphosate or a two-pass program of a preemergence residual herbicide followed by glyphosate LPOST are the preferred weed management programs in glyphosate-resistant soybean. The two-pass programs have the potential to reduce selection pressure for glyphosate-resistant weeds.

Highlights

  • Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] is an important crop in the province of Ontario, Canada that has been grown since 1893 [1]

  • The PRE herbicides reduced the density of ABUTH 42% - 97%, AMARE 68% - 96%, AMBEL 62% - 90%, CHEAL 79% 97%, ECHCG 77% - 97%, and SETVI 62% - 96% compared to the weedy control

  • Weed biomass was similar to weed density for the various herbicide treatments evaluated (Table 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] is an important crop in the province of Ontario, Canada that has been grown since 1893 [1]. Most of the soybean grown in Ontario is glyphosate-resistant which has provided growers with additional weed management options with economic advantages [4]-[6]. In 2012, about 72% of the soybean hectares in Eastern Canada were planted to glyphosate-resistant cultivars and the percentage is expected to increase in the future [5] [7]. Glyphosate provides soybean growers with an efficacious herbicide option for the control of annual, biennial and perennial weeds, and a cost-effective weed management tactic that does not result in unacceptable risks to the environment [4]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call