Two-dimensional video analysis can discriminate differences in running kinematics between recreational runners with and without running-related knee injury

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

ObjectivesTo determine whether two-dimensional video analysis could discriminate running kinematics between recreational runners with and without a running-related knee injury. DesignCase-control. SettingResearch laboratory. ParticipantsForty-two recreational runners (5 male-13 female injured; 7 male-17 female non-injured). Running-related knee injury was defined as the presence of anterior or lateral knee pain, resulting in altered running activity for at least one week. Main outcome measuresFoot and tibia inclination at initial contact, and lateral trunk position, contralateral pelvic drop, femoral adduction, hip adduction, knee flexion and ankle dorsiflexion at midstance were measured with two-dimensional video analysis during running. Participant characteristics (sex, age, body weight, body length, body mass index, running volume before injury, running speed) and two-dimensional measured angles were compared between groups. ResultsNo significant differences in participant characteristics between groups were identified (P > .05). The injured group ran with greater contralateral pelvic drop (P = .035), femoral adduction (P = .021) and hip adduction (P = .001) at midstance, and significantly smaller foot inclination at initial contact (P = .031). ConclusionTwo-dimensional video analysis can discriminate kinematics between runners with and without running-related knee injury. Greater contralateral pelvic drop, femoral adduction and hip adduction at midstance may provide running retraining targets for runners with running-related knee injury.