Two-dimensional echocardiographic estimates of left ventricular volumes obtained in different views in dogs provide similar measurements but are not interchangeable

Abstract

IntroductionLittle information exists regarding the interchangeability of left ventricular volume estimates using a monoplane Simpson's Method of Discs on images obtained from the left apical four-chamber and right parasternal long axis four-chamber views. We examined if volume estimates obtained from these views were interchangeable. AnimalsA total of 224 dogs: 86 healthy, 96 with mitral valve disease, 42 with various cardiac pathologies. Materials and methodsInvestigators obtained right parasternal long-axis and left apical four-chamber views from each dog and used manufacturer-supplied software to estimate left ventricular volumes in diastole and systole using Simpson's Method of Discs. Estimates based on linear measurements (diameter cubed, 0.67∗diameter cubed, and Teichholz) were also calculated. Reproducibility for each view, and agreement between the estimates obtained with each view, and those calculated from linear dimensions, were examined using Limits of Agreement. Reference intervals for volumes indexed to bodyweight and body surface area were calculated. ResultsNeither method proved very reproducible. Although no bias was detected, the agreement between volumes indexed to bodyweight and body surface area was insufficient to recommend interchangeability. Estimates based on Teichholz and diameter cubed methods overestimated volumes; however, those based on 0.67∗diameter cubed performed reasonably. ConclusionsMonoplane volume estimates from the left apical and right parasternal long axis four-chamber views are similar but not interchangeable. Clinicians can perform crude estimates of left ventricular volume using the equation 0.67∗diameter cubed.