Two ways to achieve an anammox influent from real reject water treatment at lab-scale: Partial SBR nitrification and SHARON process

Abstract

A comparative study to produce the correct influent for Anammox process from anaerobic sludge reject water (700–800 mg NH 4 +-N L −1) was considered here. The influent for the Anammox process must be composed of NH 4 +-N and NO 2 −-N in a ratio 1:1 and therefore only a partial nitrification of ammonium to nitrite is required. The modifications of parameters (temperature, ammonium concentration, pH and solid retention time) allows to achieve this partial nitrification with a final effluent only composed by NH 4 +-N and NO 2 −-N at the right stoichiometric ratio. The equal ratio of HCO 3 −/NH 4 + in reject water results in a natural pH decrease when approximately 50% of NH 4 + is oxidised. A Sequencing batch reactor (SBR) and a chemostat type of reactor (single-reactor high activity ammonia removal over nitrite (SHARON) process) were studied to obtain the required Anammox influent. At steady state conditions, both systems had a specific conversion rate around 40 mg NH 4 +-N g −1 volatile suspended solids (VSS) h −1, but in terms of absolute nitrogen removal the SBR conversion was 1.1 kg N day −1 m −3, whereas in the SHARON chemostat was 0.35 kg N day −1 m −3 due to the different hydraulic retention time (HRT) used. Both systems are compared from operational (including starvation experiments) and kinetic point of view and their advantages/disadvantages are discussed.