Abstract
This paper argues that there are two types of ditransitive verbs in Japanese that associate their dative arguments with different structural positions: one projects the dative argument in a lower position than the accusative argument, whereas the other generates it in a higher position than the accusative argument. Evidence for this proposal comes from a difference observed in causative-inchoative alternations of ditransitive verbs. One type of verb promotes the accusative argument to the subject of the inchoative variant, which is discussed in Baker (1993, 1995). However, the other type advances the dative argument to the subject. It is also claimed that the dative arguments of the two types of verbs are distinguished by thematic role: one is goal, whereas the other is experiencer. Furthermore, this paper deals with issues concerning the structure of a passive construction, locality of A-movement, and the structural condition on bound variable reading of a pronoun.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
