Abstract

This study tackled the multimodal facility location problem in emergency medical rescue. First, an intermodal setting was suggested, i.e., considering cooperation between ground ambulances and helicopters in emergency medical rescues. Specifically, four scheduling modes were structured: air only, ground only, air-ground combined mode if landing and take-off site for helicopters near the wounded is available, and air-ground transshipment if the landing and take-off site for helicopters near the wounded is not available. Second, a two-stage covering location model was proposed. In the first stage, a set-covering model was developed to achieve maximum coverage and minimal total construction cost of emergency rescue facilities. The optimal mixed allocation proportion of helicopters and ground ambulances was then obtained to guarantee cohesion between the hierarchical models and covering characteristics and the economic efficiency of location results. In the second stage, for given emergency locations, an emergency scheduling mode matrix was constructed for meeting response time and total rescue time constraints. The proposed model obtains optimal results in terms of coverage, construction cost, and rescue time. A case study of Beijing, China validated the feasibility and efficiency of the two-stage covering location model for multimodal emergency medical rescue network. The proposed air-ground rescue system and two-stage covering location model can be extended and also used for large-scale disaster rescue management.

Highlights

  • Aeromedical rescue rapidly responds to emergency calls and provides patients with prompt medical aid in urban emergency medical rescues and it is critical for patients with serious diseases or injuries that require urgent care; doctors or hospitals cannot be reached in time while using other means of transportation

  • Five measures were used to compare the performance of the proposed model with the model that was proposed by Erdemir et al [8] to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed model—coverage, construction cost, average rescue time, maximal rescue time, and mean computation time

  • This study proposed a comprehensive air–ground emergency medical rescue system that uses four emergency scheduling modes, namely, airside, landside, air–ground combined transport, and air–ground transshipment

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Aeromedical rescue rapidly responds to emergency calls and provides patients with prompt medical aid in urban emergency medical rescues and it is critical for patients with serious diseases or injuries that require urgent care; doctors or hospitals cannot be reached in time while using other means of transportation. Helicopters (and emerging electric vertical take-off and landing (eVTOL) aircraft), serving as the aeromedical transportation, can realize point-to-point transport and greatly shorten the response and rescue times. Ncy medical rescue system is framed and four scheduling mode(2s)arAe tiwnote-sgtargaetecodvceroinngsildocearteiodn.model is established.

Facility Location
Objective
Rescue Mode Selection
Problem Statement
Set Covering Model of Air–Ground Collaborative Transport Scheduling Location
Maximal Covering Model of Air–Ground Collaborative Scheduling Location
Solution Approach
Results of locations
CCoommppuuttaattiioonnaall EExxppeerriimmeennttss
Model Comparative Analysis
Comparative Analysis of Transport Modes
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call