Abstract
Since the end of the Cold War there has been a growing tendency within the arms control community to treat major conventional weapons and small arms and light weapons as separate fields of action. This essay challenges the utility of this differentiation and argues instead that effective arms control requires that the full range of conventional weapons be addressed when policy proposals are formulated.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
