Abstract
AbstractThis study investigated two random forest (RF) models for the non‐iterative parametrization of surface‐layer turbulent fluxes: (a) the RF scheme, a calculation model that is directly trained using correlated variables, and (b) the RF_Li10 scheme, a random forest correction model based on the Li10 scheme (Li et al., 2010, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-010-9523-y). A comparison between these two new models and the Li10 scheme against an iterative scheme revealed the hierarchy of maximum relative errors in estimating stability parameters, as well as momentum and heat transfer coefficients. This hierarchy is as follows: the Li10 scheme is the greatest, followed by the RF scheme, with the RF_Li10 scheme exhibiting the least errors.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
