Abstract
C21H18N2O3, Mr = 346.4, monoclinic, C2/c, a = 17.230 (3), b = 12.322 (2), c = 19.675 (3) A, beta = 121.265 (12) degrees, V = 3571 (2) A3, Z = 8, D chi = 1.289 g cm-3, lambda(Cu K alpha) = 1.54184 A, mu = 6.70 cm-1, F(000) = 1456, T = 296 K, R = 0.039 for 3209 observations (of 3691 unique data); triclinic, P1, a = 7.678 (2), b = 10.822 (2), c = 12.539 (2) A, alpha = 63.34 (2); beta = 74.92 (2); gamma = 84.04 (2) degrees, V = 899.1 (4) A3, Z = 2, D chi = 1.279 g cm-3, lambda(Cu K alpha) = 1.54184 A, mu = 6.65 cm-1, F(000) = 364, T = 299 K, R = 0.036 for 3095 observations (of 3399 unique data). Distances and angles are quite similar in the two structures. There are two strong intramolecular hydrogen bonds between a phenolic oxygen and an imino nitrogen in each structure. The intermolecular hydrogen bonds between two phenolic oxygens are closer in the monoclinic crystal than in the triclinic. This closer packing produces the higher melting point for the monoclinic polymorph.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Acta Crystallographica Section C Crystal Structure Communications
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.