Abstract

The Gaussian noise burst model and the domain model for imperfectly mode-locked laser pulses are examined through comparison with two types of two-photon interference measurements of a synchronously pumped cw mode-locked dye laser. The Gaussian noise burst model does not give correct results for the pulse-cycle-averaged, normalized second-order correlation function at zero time-delay, and the domain model fails to explain the two-component dip in coincidence count rate curves obtained with the interferometer configuration.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.