Abstract

In co-located, multi-user settings such as multi-touch tables, user interfaces need to be accessible from multiple viewpoints. In this project, we investigated how this goal can be achieved for depictions of data in bar graphs. We designed a laboratory task in which participants answered simple questions based on information depicted in bar graphs presented from differently rotated points of view. As the dependent variable, we measured differences in response onsets relative to the standard viewpoint (i.e., upright graphs). In Experiment 1, we manipulated graph and label orientation independently of each other. We observed that rotations of the labels rather than rotations of the graph itself pose a challenge for accessing depicted information from rotated viewpoints. In Experiment 2, we studied whether replacing word labels with pictographs could overcome the detrimental effects of rotated labels. Rotated pictographs were less detrimental than rotated word labels, but performance was still worse than in the unrotated baseline condition. In Experiment 3, we studied whether color coding could overcome the detrimental effects of rotated labels. Indeed, for multicolored labels, the detrimental effect of label rotation was in the negligible range. We discuss the implications of our findings for the underlying psychological theory as well as for the design of depicted statistical information in multi-user settings.

Highlights

  • Imagine you are sitting opposite to someone who has spread out a newspaper across the table

  • Labels consisting of written words that co-rotated with the bar graph revealed the largest mental normalization costs

  • We did not observe substantial costs when the letters remained upright to the observers, signaling that it was not the rotation of the bars that induced the mental normalization costs

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Imagine you are sitting opposite to someone who has spread out a newspaper across the table. With regard to the perception and recognition of objects, a substantial body of previous research has confirmed the existence of canonical viewpoints from which depicted information can be accessed the most efficiently in terms of errors and speed. Deviations from this canonical viewpoint (i.e., non-canonical views) typically come along with increasing access costs (Diwadkar & McNamara, 1997; Palmer et al, 1981; Tarr, 1995). Following an approach of useinspired research, our aim was to investigate ways to reduce the detrimental effects of non-canonical viewpoints based on psychological theories of feature and information processing

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call