Abstract
AbstractAmmonia is a promising carbon‐free energy vector. Small‐scale renewable power‐to‐ammonia (P2A) is particularly suited for isolated agricultural areas where ammonia can be used as fuel and fertilizer. This work compares two approaches to simulate and optimize the steady‐state behavior of a novel small‐scale P2A process: Aspen Plus® and MOSAIC®. Aspen Plus® is a commercial flow sheeting software whereas MOSAIC® is a freeware where equations and thermochemical properties need to be specified by hand. It can be shown that the results of MOSAIC® and Aspen Plus® are qualitatively comparable, but not identical. This suggests that the model in MOSAIC® can be improved further, starting with the implementation of a more accurate numeric reactor kinetics and equation of state.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
