Abstract

The effectiveness of two monitoring programs, designed to describe and quantify the bycatch from commercial pots, was examined in the South Australian rock lobster (Jasus edwardsii) fishery (SARLF). The first, logbook sampling, relied on information collected and recorded by fishers in logbooks. The second, bycatch sampling, required fishers to collect bycatch specimens on a nominated day for later scientific analysis. A total of 40 bycatch species were recorded during the study. Finfish, mainly blue-throat wrasse (Notolabrus tetricus) and leather jacket species (Meuschenia hippocrepis and Meushenia australis), were the major component (>90% by number). Data from the logbook program were appropriate for monitoring spatio-temporal trends in bycatch, whereas the bycatch sampling provided more accurate information on bycatch species. Each program was subject to bias when estimating total bycatch numbers and, as a result, a combination of both methods indicated a cost-effective and appropriate way with which to monitor bycatch from the fishery. In comparison with other fisheries, bycatch from the SARLF was relatively low; however, because bycatch was dominated by relatively few species, ongoing monitoring and risk assessment of these populations is needed to ensure long-term sustainability of bycatch levels.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.