Abstract

Detailed sampling across three dolerite dykes of different size (small, 7 cm; middle, 75 cm; and thick, 675 cm) of the Åland-Åboland dyke swarm has revealed an internal zonation of an anomalous nature. The small, almost glassy dyke exhibits a systematic inward decrease in whole-rock MgO and Mg# (indicating a normal fractionation trend) together with a simultaneous increase in normative An and Cpx and decrease in whole-rock Zr, Y, CaO, TiO 2 (indicating a reverse fractionation trend). The middle dyke shows similar compositional trends across its narrow margins, but in the more crystalline interior whole-rock MgO and Mg# gradually but steadily increase inwards. As a result normal and reverse fractionation trends of the margins grade to exclusively reverse fractionation trends of the interior. The thick, almost totally crystalline dyke exhibits an internal zonation similar to that of the middle dyke, with fractionation trends becoming only much more pronounced in the centre of the dyke. The almost glassy nature of small dyke suggests that its anomalous compositional zonation most likely resulted from temporal changes in the composition of magma as it formed the dyke. The mechanism(s) responsible for such systematic changes in composition of inflowing magma remains, however, unknown. The margins of middle and thick dyke form in a similar way whereas their interiors formed by in situ cumulate growth against dyke sidewalls. This process resulted in a gradual inward increase in the proportion of cumulus phases owing to magma crystallization in progressively less supercooled conditions with increasing distance from cold country rocks. The compositional zonation of these dolerite dykes is thus produced by two independently operating mechanisms: successive changes in composition of inflowing magma ( an external liquid-state process) and an in situ cumulate growth on dyke sidewalls ( an internal crystal-liquid process). Based on the relatively minor development of internal zonation in interiors of middle and thick dykes, the former mechanism appears to be several times more effective in causing magma differentiation than the latter. It remains to be determined whether these two processes are a general reason for the formation of marginal reversals in mafic–ultramafic dykes, sills and large layered intrusions.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call