Abstract

The horizontal-vertical (HV) illusion is characterized by a tendency to overestimate the length of vertically-arranged objects. Comparative research is primarily confined to primates, a range of species that, although arboreal, often explore their environment moving along the horizontal axis. Such behaviour may have led to the development of asymmetrical perceptual mechanisms to make relative size judgments of objects placed vertically and horizontally. We observed the susceptibility to the HV illusion in fish, whose ability to swim along the horizontal and vertical plane permits them to scan objects' size equally on both axes. Guppies (Poecilia reticulata) were trained to select the longer orange line to receive a food reward. In the test phase, two arrays, containing two same-sized lines were presented, one horizontally and the other vertically. Black lines were also included in each pattern to generate the perception of an inverted T-shape (where a horizontal line is bisected by a vertical one) or an L-shape (no bisection). No bias was observed in the L-shape, which supports the idea of differential perceptual mechanisms for primates and fish. In the inverted T-shape, guppies estimated the bisected line as shorter, providing the first evidence of a length bisection bias in a fish species.

Highlights

  • The horizontal-vertical (HV) illusion is one of the most studied distortion illusions [e.g. 1, 2, 3]

  • We investigated the susceptibility to the HV illusion in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata), a freshwater teleost fish commonly used in cognitive/perceptual studies [16, 17, 18]

  • The guppies demonstrated a significant preference for the vertical line in the Inverted-T Illusion whereas no preference bias was exhibited in the L Illusion

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The horizontal-vertical (HV) illusion is one of the most studied distortion illusions [e.g. 1, 2, 3]. It is represented as an inverted T: the length of the horizontal line is identical to that of the vertical line, the latter appears longer to human observers (Fig 1). To explain this phenomenon, three main hypotheses have been advanced. The ends of the vertical line are likely to be found near the boundary of the visual field, which allows the vertical line to assimilate the perceptual properties of the vertical visual field, appearing slightly longer. The ends of the horizontal line are likely to be found far from the boundary of the horizontal visual field.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call