Abstract

BackgroundThe distribution of Pooideae species varies across Europe. Especially, Timothy is less represented in Southern than in Northern Europe. Since allergenic cross-reactivity between pollens from different grasses is only partial, grass pollen-allergic patients are expected to display different sensitization profiles, with specific IgE directed against different combinations of allergenic epitopes, depending on their living places in Europe and the grasses they are exposed to. In this context, this study aimed at comparing two tablets commercially available for allergy immunotherapy, namely a 5-grass (Cocksfoot, Meadow-grass, Rye-grass, Sweet vernal-grass and Timothy) and a 1-grass (Timothy) pollen tablets, for their ability to represent the sensitization profiles of patients, depending on whether they live in Southern or Northern Europe.MethodsSera were collected from adult patients living in Spain (n = 19) and Sweden (n = 22). Tablets were compared for their ability to inhibit the binding of patient serum IgE to pollen allergens from twelve grasses commonly distributed throughout Europe, as determined by the areas under the curves obtained by ELISA-inhibition. Tablets were adjusted to an equivalent allergenic activity, based on the CBER/FDA bioequivalent allergy unit.ResultsInhibition of the IgE binding to pollen allergens from twelve grasses was significantly stronger with the 5-grass than with the 1-grass pollen tablet (p < 0.0001), regardless of whether patients were considered as a whole or by geographical area. This difference between tablets was significantly greater for Southern than Northern European patients (p < 0.05).ConclusionsCompared to the 1-grass tablet, the 5-grass tablet generally covers better the sensitization profiles of European patients, especially patients from Southern Europe, in principle less exposed to pollen from Timothy than from other grasses. The 5-grass tablet is therefore expected to elicit larger spectra of blocking antibodies, which might have implications in light of the generally accepted mechanisms of allergy immunotherapy.

Highlights

  • The distribution of Pooideae species varies across Europe

  • In the current study, two grass sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) tablets of different compositions, the 5-grass pollen tablet O­ RALAIR® and the 1-grass pollen tablet ­Grazax®/Grastek®, were compared with regard to their ability to mimic the various repertoires of epitopes recognized by the IgE from grass pollen-allergic European patients

  • To compare the ability of the two grass tablets to mimic the repertoires of epitopes recognized by grass pollenallergic patients IgE, the two tablets were evaluated at equivalent allergenic activity, as expressed in the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER)/ Food and Drug Administration (FDA) common bioequivalent allergy unit (BAU) unit for grass pollen extracts [18]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The distribution of Pooideae species varies across Europe. Especially, Timothy is less represented in Southern than in Northern Europe. European grass-pollen allergic patients are expected to display different IgE sensitization profiles, with IgE directed against different combinations of allergenic epitopes, according to their geographic location and the grass species they are exposed to This may have important implications for allergy immunotherapy (AIT), based on a recent study from Kinaciyan et al comparing the clinical efficacy on birch pollen-related apple allergy of two sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) formulations containing either the apple allergen Mal d 1 or the birch pollen allergen Bet v 1, as recombinant molecules [5]. Those data suggest that the clinical efficacy of an AIT product may be improved when it reflects the full repertoire of epitopes recognized by patients’

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call