Abstract

A key question confronting computational chemists concerns the preferable ligand geometry that fits complementarily into the receptor pocket. Typically, the postulated ‘bioactive’ 3D ligand conformation is constructed as a ‘sophisticated guess’ (unnecessarily geometry-optimized) mirroring the pharmacophore hypothesis—sometimes based on an erroneous prerequisite. Hence, 4D-QSAR scheme and its ‘dialects’ have been practically implemented as higher level of model abstraction that allows the examination of the multiple molecular conformation, orientation and protonation representation, respectively. Nearly a quarter of a century has passed since the eminent work of Hopfinger appeared on the stage; therefore the natural question occurs whether 4D-QSAR approach is still appealing to the scientific community? With no intention to be comprehensive, a review of the current state of art in the field of receptor-independent (RI) and receptor-dependent (RD) 4D-QSAR methodology is provided with a brief examination of the ‘mainstream’ algorithms. In fact, a myriad of 4D-QSAR methods have been implemented and applied practically for a diverse range of molecules. It seems that, 4D-QSAR approach has been experiencing a promising renaissance of interests that might be fuelled by the rising power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) clusters applied to full-atom MD-based simulations of the protein-ligand complexes.

Highlights

  • A quarter of a century has passed since the eminent work of Hopfinger appeared on the stage [1]; a natural question arises: Is the 4D-quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) approach still attractive to computational chemists? A rational production/prediction of ADMET-tailored properties in the hit→lead→seed→drug cascade is a challenging object of interest for contemporary chemistry, that necessitates at least four German G’s: Glück, Geld, Geschick and Geduld—the rank order of which depends on the discovery project under scrutiny [2,3]

  • The application of alignment-independent descriptors does not address the issues of the proper conformer selection; 4D-QSAR scheme and its ‘dialects’ have been practically implemented as higher level of a model abstraction that allows the investigation of the multiple molecular conformation, orientation and protonation representation, respectively [25,26,27,28]

  • The adaptive and competitive Kohonen algorithm was used in order to produce planar (2D) topographic maps, that represent the signals from chosen atoms of the molecular trajectory

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A quarter of a century has passed since the eminent work of Hopfinger appeared on the stage [1]; a natural question arises: Is the 4D-QSAR approach still attractive to computational chemists? A rational production/prediction of ADMET-tailored properties (in other words finding a ‘sweet spot’) in the hit→lead→seed→drug cascade is a challenging object of interest for contemporary chemistry, that necessitates at least four German G’s: Glück (luck), Geld (money), Geschick (skill) and Geduld (patience)—the rank order of which depends on the discovery project under scrutiny [2,3]. The application of alignment-independent descriptors does not address the issues of the proper conformer selection; 4D-QSAR scheme and its ‘dialects’ have been practically implemented as higher level of a model abstraction that allows the investigation of the multiple molecular conformation, orientation and protonation representation, respectively [25,26,27,28]. A distinct site-directed 4D-QSAR approach has been promoted recently, where the resultant 3D-pharmacophore pattern is directly dependent upon the explicit geometry of the binding/active pocket in order to capture the potential induced-fit phenomena, especially for the conformationally flexible ligand analogues [52,53,54,55]. RD 4D-QSAR models qualitatively ‘captured’ the valid regions of the TR receptor

Neural 4D-QSAR Methodology
Lattice 4D-QSAR Approach
SiRMS 4D-QSAR Protocol
Hybrid 4D-QSAR Approach
Quasar 4D-QSAR Approach
Findings
Methodology
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call