Abstract

Big Basal Area Factor (Big BAF) and Point-3P are two-stage sampling methods. In the first stage the sampling units, in both methods, are Bitterlich points where the selection of the trees is proportional to their basal area. In the second stage, sampling units are trees which are a subset of the first stage trees. In the Big BAF method, the probability of selecting trees in the second stage is made proportional to the two BAFs’ ratio, with a basal area factor larger than that of the first stage. In the Point-3P method the probability of selecting trees, in the second stage, is based on the height prediction and use of a specific random number table. Estimates of the forest stands’ volume and their sampling errors are based on the theory of the product of two random variables. The increasing error in the second stage is small, but the total cost of measuring the trees is much smaller than simply using the first stage, with all the trees measured. In general, the two sampling methods are modern and cost-effective approaches that can be applied in forest stand inventories for forest management purposes and are receiving the growing interest of researchers in the current decade.

Highlights

  • In the first stage the sampling units, in both methods, are Bitterlich points where the selection of the trees is proportional to their basal area

  • In the second stage, sampling units are trees which are a subset of the first stage trees

  • The object of this paper is to present the two sampling methods of Big Basal Area Factor (Big BAF) and Point-3P in a systematic way

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Forest Inventory (FI) plays a vital role in all the aspects of forest management (Rice, Weiskittel, & Wagner, 2014), providing the necessary high-quality bio-. The measurements of the first stage include the number of trees (of various species) and give the basal area from the Bitterlich sample using a BAF angle gauge (Lindemuth, 2007; Marshall et al, 2004; Rennie et al, 1991; Yang & Burkhart, 2018) Many applications of both methods, Big BAF and Point-3P, involved operational FIs (Marshall et al, 2004; Opalach, 2017; Rice et al, 2014; West, 2011; Yang & Burkhart, 2018). A brief mathematical description of the two methods is given in the fourth section, and the last section links the two sampling methods to forest inventories and forest management

The Big BAF Sampling Method
The Point-3P Sampling Method
Mathematical Description of Two Sampling Methods
The Two Sampling Methods in Forest Inventories and Forest Management
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.