Abstract
We study Cabibbo-favored (CF) and singly Cabibbo-suppressed (SCS) two-body hadronic weak decays of the antitriplet charmed baryons ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}}_{c}^{+}$, ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Xi}}}_{c}^{0}$, and ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Xi}}}_{c}^{+}$ with more focus on the last two. Both factorizable and nonfactorizable contributions are considered in the topologic diagram approach. The estimation of nonfactorizable contributions from $W$-exchange and inner $W$-emission diagrams relies on the pole model and current algebra. The nonperturbative parameters in both factorizable and nonfactorizable parts are calculated in the MIT bag model. Branching fractions and up-down decay asymmetries for all the CF and SCS decays of antitriplet charmed baryons are presented. The prediction of $\mathcal{B}({\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Xi}}}_{c}^{+}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Xi}}}^{0}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{+})$ agrees well with the measurements inferred from Belle and CLEO, while the calculated $\mathcal{B}({\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Xi}}}_{c}^{0}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Xi}}}^{\ensuremath{-}}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{+})$ is too large compared to the recent Belle measurement. We conclude that these two ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Xi}}}_{c}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Xi}}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{+}$ modes cannot be simultaneously explained within the current-algebra framework for $S$-wave amplitudes. This issue needs to be resolved in future study. The long-standing puzzle with the branching fraction and decay asymmetry of ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}}_{c}^{+}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Xi}}}^{0}{K}^{+}$ is resolved by noting that only the type-II $W$-exchange diagram contributes to this mode. We find that not only does the calculated rate agree with experiment but also the predicted decay asymmetry is consistent with the SU(3)-flavor symmetry approach in sign and magnitude. Likewise, the CF mode ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Xi}}}_{c}^{0}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}}^{+}{K}^{\ensuremath{-}}$ and the SCS decays ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Xi}}}_{c}^{0}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}p{K}^{\ensuremath{-}}$, ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}}^{+}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{\ensuremath{-}}$ proceed only through type-II $W$ exchange. They are predicted to have large and positive decay asymmetries. These features can be tested in the near future.
Highlights
There has been significant progress in the experimental study of charm physics
In this work we have systematically studied the branching fractions and up-down decay asymmetries of CF and singly Cabibbo-suppressed (SCS) decays of antitriplet charmed baryons
To estimate the nonfactorizable contributions, we work in the pole model for the P-wave amplitudes and current algebra for S-wave ones
Summary
There has been significant progress in the experimental study of charm physics. It turns out that if the S-wave amplitude is evaluated in the pole model or in the covariant quark model and its variant, the decay asymmetries for both Λþc → Σþπ0 and Σ0πþ are always predicted to be positive, while it was measured to be −0.45 Æ 0.31 Æ 0.06 for Σþπ0 by CLEO [27]. The negative sign of αðΛþc → Σþπ0Þ measured by CLEO is nicely confirmed by BESIII This is one of the strong reasons why we adapt current algebra to work out parity-violating amplitudes. (i) new data on the branching fractions and lifetimes of Ξþc ;0, (ii) correct sign predictions of α in Λþc → Σþπ0 and Σ0πþ by current algebra, and (iii) the long-standing puzzle of Λþc → Ξ0Kþ and its implication to the Ξc sector. The expressions of baryon matrix elements and axial-vector form factor calculated in the MIT bag model are presented in Appendix D
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have