Two approaches for truss topology optimization: a comparison for practical use

Abstract

This paper discusses ground structure approaches for topology optimization of trusses. These topology optimization methods select an optimal subset of bars from the set of all possible bars defined on a discrete grid. The objectives used are based either on minimum compliance or on minimum volume. Advantages and disadvantages are discussed and it is shown that constraints exist where the formulations become equivalent. The incorporation of stability constraints (buckling) into topology design is important. The influence of buckling on the optimal layout is demonstrated by a bridge design example. A second example shows the applicability of truss topology optimization to a real engineering stiffened membrane problem.