Abstract

Deep mixed (DM) columns have been commonly used to increase bearing capacity of soft soil and reduce total and differential settlements of embankments. In most analyses (especially numerical analyses) of embankments over DM columns, two-dimensional models are commonly used for simplicity. However, it is not clear how well the two-dimensional (2D) models represent the behavior of embankments over DM columns that are typically installed in a three-dimensional (3D) pattern, such as a square or triangular pattern. In this study, 2D and 3D numerical analyses were conducted to show the comparisons of their results including maximum settlements and vertical stresses. In the 2D analysis, individual DM columns and the soil between these columns are converted to several DM walls parallel to the centerline of the embankment. The DM walls are assumed to have equivalent moduli or strength averaged from the individual DM columns and the soil between these columns based on their areas and moduli or strengths. The comparisons show that the 2D model calculates slightly (conservatively) larger maximum settlements at the base of the embankment than the 3D model if the DM walls/columns are within the elastic limit. However, the 2D and 3D models produce very different results of vertical stresses on the top of DM walls/columns.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.