Abstract

In a graph $G$ , two spanning trees $T_{1}$ and $T_{2}$ are rooted at the same vertex $r$ . If, for every $v \in V(G)$ , the paths from $v$ to the root $r$ in $T_{1}$ and $T_{2}$ are internally vertex-disjoint, they are called independent spanning trees (ISTs). ISTs can be applied in numerous fields, such as fault-tolerant broadcasting and secure message distribution. The ( $n$ , $k$ )-star graphs $S_{n,k}$ constitute a generalized version of the star network. The method of constructing ISTs in ( $n$ , $k$ )-star graphs remains unknown. In this paper, we propose one recursive algorithm and one parallel algorithm for constructing ISTs on ( $n$ , $k$ )-star graphs. The main ideas of the recursive algorithm are to use induction to change small trees into large trees, to use a modified breadth-first search (MBFS) traversal to create a frame for an IST, and to use a breadth-first search (BFS) traversal to connect the rest of nodes. The main ideas of the parallel algorithm are to create frames through MBFS traversals in parallel, and to use some specific rules to connect the rest of nodes in parallel. We also present validation proofs for both algorithms, and analyze the time complexities of both algorithms. The time complexity of the recursive algorithm in $S_{n,k}$ is $O\left({n\times \frac {n!}{(n-k)!}}\right)$ , where $\frac {n!}{(n-k)!}$ is the number of nodes of $S_{n,k}$ . The time complexity of the parallel algorithm can be reduced to $O\left({\frac {n!}{(n-k)!}}\right)$ if the system has $n-1$ processors computing in parallel. Both algorithms are correct with the stated time complexity values; the parallel algorithm is more efficient than the recursive algorithm.

Highlights

  • In a graph G, two spanning trees T1 and T2 are rooted at the same vertex r

  • We propose one recursive algorithm and one parallel algorithm for constructing independent spanning trees (ISTs) on (n,k)-star graphs

  • The time complexity of the parallel algorithm can be reduced to if the system has n processors computing in parallel. Both algorithms are correct with the stated time complexity values; the parallel algorithm is more efficient than the recursive algorithm

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

In a graph G, two spanning trees T1 and T2 are rooted at the same vertex r. Huang et al.: Two Algorithms for Constructing Independent Spanning Trees in (n,k)-Star Graphs hypercubes [26], parity cubes [23], folded hypercubes [27], and bubble-sort networks [19], [20], alternating group networks [16]. In those studies, some parallel algorithms have been proposed on twisted cubes [5], locally twisted cubes [4], parity cubes [3], and hypercubes [25], [26]. We propose one recursive algorithm and one parallel algorithm Both of which construct ISTs in (n,k)-star graphs. S5,3 consists of 60 nodes and 120 edges, as displayed in Figure 4, and is composed of five instances S4,2

PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATIONS
ALGORITHMS Notations used here are defined as follows:
A FrameGermSet stores elements whose data structure as below:
PROOFS Lemma 3
ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call