Abstract

Large-scale data from social media have a significant potential to describe complex phenomena in the real world and to anticipate collective behaviors such as information spreading and social trends. One specific case of study is represented by the collective attention to the action of political parties. Not surprisingly, researchers and stakeholders tried to correlate parties' presence on social media with their performances in elections. Despite the many efforts, results are still inconclusive since this kind of data is often very noisy and significant signals could be covered by (largely unknown) statistical fluctuations. In this paper we consider the number of tweets (tweet volume) of a party as a proxy of collective attention to the party, identify the dynamics of the volume, and show that this quantity has some information on the election outcome. We find that the distribution of the tweet volume for each party follows a log-normal distribution with a positive autocorrelation of the volume over short terms, which indicates the volume has large fluctuations of the log-normal distribution yet with a short-term tendency. Furthermore, by measuring the ratio of two consecutive daily tweet volumes, we find that the evolution of the daily volume of a party can be described by means of a geometric Brownian motion (i.e., the logarithm of the volume moves randomly with a trend). Finally, we determine the optimal period of averaging tweet volume for reducing fluctuations and extracting short-term tendencies. We conclude that the tweet volume is a good indicator of parties' success in the elections when considered over an optimal time window. Our study identifies the statistical nature of collective attention to political issues and sheds light on how to model the dynamics of collective attention in social media.

Highlights

  • As social animals, since a long time ago, humans have communicated, exchanged opinions, and tried to reconcile their conflicts by means of social instruments

  • The main results of this paper are summarized as follows. (i) We find that the daily tweet volumes of political parties before elections follow log-normal distributions and have positive autocorrelations over short terms. (ii) The daily volume evolution can be described by means of geometric Brownian motion. (iii) If we want to consider the average behavior of daily tweet volume, it is necessary to consider long enough period for reducing statistical fluctuations, but not too long, to not destroy short-term memories with relevant information

  • Social media permeate all levels of society rapidly and widely

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Since a long time ago, humans have communicated, exchanged opinions, and tried to reconcile their conflicts by means of social instruments. In this paper we consider tweet volumes about political parties as proxies of collective attention to the parties and by investigating the dynamics of tweet volumes we try to assess their relation (and forecasting power) with the final results of elections. We find that the distributions of daily tweet volume of each political party is in good agreement with log-normal distribution [32] This observation indicates that the average behavior of daily tweet volume may have some information, yet large fluctuations can be behind the average. Our analysis suggests what really tweet volume of each political party means in a quantitative way and sheds light on how we can separate the noise and the signal for better prediction using social media data

Materials and Methods
12 May 2013
Results
Discussion
41. Wikipedia
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call