Twenty-one-gene recurrence score (RS) in germline (g)CHEK2 mutation-associated versus sporadic breast cancers (BC): A multi-site case-control study.

Abstract

10531 Background: Genomic assays, such as RS, are used to determine chemotherapy benefit in early-stage, estrogen receptor (ER)- and/or progesterone receptor (PR)-positive, HER2 negative BC patients (pts). Currently, guidelines to use pts’ germline genetic testing results to guide adjuvant therapy are lacking. Several reports have indicated worse outcomes for BC pts with g CHEK2 pathogenic variants (PV). We investigated whether PV in CHEK2 were associated with increased RS. Methods: Patient-level clinical data and RS were derived from electronic medical records of seven medical centers between years 2013-17. Confirmation of RS using the Genomic Health provider portal was performed. 38 pts with germline PV in CHEK2 (15 pts/39.5% with c.1100delC mutation) and RS score (cases) were matched with BC pts whose genetic testing did not identify PV (controls) using a 1:2 matching schema. Pts were matched based on age at diagnosis and lymph node (LN) status. LN negative pts were further matched based on T-stage. A multivariate random intercept linear mixed model of CHEK2 mutation status on RS was performed, adjusting for PR. A secondary ordinal univariate analysis was conducted that categorized RS into low, intermediate and high risk ( < 18, 18-30, and > 30, respectively). P-values were reported based on a null hypothesis of no effect against a two-sided alternative. Results: The median RS for cases was 19.5 (interquartile range [IQR]: 15 to 25) and the median RS for controls was 18 (IQR: 12 to 22). A greater proportion of cases were categorized as high risk (10.5%) compared to controls (5.6%), and a smaller proportion of cases were categorized as low risk (36.8%) compared to controls (49.3%). Cases had higher grade and increased proportion of PR-negative BC as compared with controls (grade 1: 12.1% of cases versus 32.4% of controls; PR-negative: 7.9% of cases versus 5.6% of controls). The variables used to match cases and controls (age, lymph node status, and T-stage) had similar summary statistics. The RS was 1.97-point higher in pts with g CHEK2 PV compared to controls, after adjusting for PR (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-point lower to 4.96-point higher; p = 0.194). The secondary analysis of CHEK2 mutation status on an ordinal RS risk group yielded comparable results; on average, the odds of being high risk compared to the combined intermediate/low risk groups was 1.72 times higher in cases compared to controls (95% CI: 0.77 to 3.80; p = 0.181), but these differences were not significant. Conclusions: Our case-control study did not show a statistically higher RS for BC that develops in pts with g CHEK2 PV. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the association between type of CHEK2 PV (frameshift versus missense) and other modifying genetic variables and RS.