Twenty-year comparison of the human allograft and porcine xenograft

Abstract

This study compares a retrospective consecutive series of human allografts and concurrent porcine xenografts implanted over a 10-year interval. There were 571 allograft valves and 1,351 xenograft valves implanted in the aortic and mitral position with mean follow-up of 12.8 years for the allografts and 6.2 years for the xenografts. This study compares the incidence of structural deterioration over long-term follow-up. We found that there was no significant difference between four manufacturers of porcine xenografts, in spite of substantial differences in processing techniques. We found that there was a significant difference in allografts that were premounted on stents as compared with allografts that were not premounted on stents for aortic valve replacement. We found that there was no significant difference between allografts for aortic valve replacement dut were not premounted on stents and porcine xenografts implanted in the aortic position. These findings are in marked contrast to those of other reported series with the use of allograft valves.