Abstract

This Article argues that the historical record supports activism that takes the abolition of the child welfare system as its starting point, rather than its reform. It explores the birth of the modern child welfare system in the 1950s as part of the white supremacist effort to punish Black communities that sought desegregation of schools and other public accommodations; and Native communities that fought tribal termination and the taking of indigenous land. Beginning with the “segregation package” of laws passed by the Louisiana state legislature in 1960, the Article shows how cutting so-called “illegitimate” children off the welfare program, called Aid to Dependent Children, (ADC) and placing those whom their mothers could no longer support in foster care was an explicit response to school desegregation. While the National Urban League initially mounted a formidable national and international mutual aid effort, “Operation Feed the Babies,” its ultimate response—appealing to the federal government to reform the welfare and child welfare systems— backfired in disastrous ways. The Eisenhower administration responded by providing federal funds for a program it called ADC-foster care, giving states resources to dramatically expand the foster care system, resulting in hundreds of thousands of Black children in foster homes within a year. Native Tribal nations, in contrast, fought throughout the late 1960s and 70s to get states out of Indian child welfare. After a decade of activism, in 1978, they succeeded in passing the Indian Child Welfare Act, which put American Indian kids under the jurisdiction of tribal courts instead of the states’. Over the next decades, the number of Native children in foster care shrank dramatically. While history rarely offers clear guidance for the present, these two stories strongly suggest the limits of reform for state child welfare systems, and the wisdom of contemporary activists who call for abolition.

Highlights

  • In her keynote for this conference,[1] Dorothy Roberts walks us through the arguments against reforming the foster care system, which are in many ways akin to those against continuing to reform the police. She joins many scholars and activists voicing similar frustrations with what seems to be an entrenched, unmovable child welfare system that engages in racialized harm to families by disproportionately separating Black, Indigenous, Latinx, and impoverished white children from their parents, kin, and caregivers.[2]

  • In the 1950s and 60s, the National Urban League confronted a child welfare system that was used as part of the white South’s “massive resistance” to school desegregation, taking Black children away from their parents to terrorize communities fighting for civil rights.[3]

  • When state welfare workers denigrated Native families and caregiving structures—insisting grandmothers were too old to care for children, and that leaving babies and young people with relatives evidenced a mothers’ neglect—lawyers and members of tribal councils said they lacked understanding of Native kinship, culture, and community

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In her keynote for this conference,[1] Dorothy Roberts walks us through the arguments against reforming the foster care system, which are in many ways akin to those against continuing to reform the police.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.