Turning points, identity, and social capital: A meta-ethnography of methamphetamine recovery

Abstract

BackgroundDespite the increasing prevalence and distinct nature of methamphetamine-related harms, treatment models are limited, and relapse is common. Meta-ethnography has been increasingly used to synthesise qualitative health research and develop new concepts or theories. This meta-ethnography aimed to explore methamphetamine users’ experiences of cessation, recovery, and relapse, to better understand how to tailor support for this population. MethodsA systematic review was conducted of six electronic databases, supported by hand searches of leading journals and reviews of reference lists. Reports were included that used naturalistic participant observation to examine methamphetamine cessation, recovery, and relapse with at least 50% of their sample. The life course approach to drug use was used to inform the process of data analysis and interpretation. The final sample was synthesised using Reciprocal Translation supported by open and axial coding. ResultsNineteen sources were selected, thirteen of which were conducted in the United States. Two themes were identified: methamphetamine users are exposed to a range of relapse triggers, but also triggers for recovery, and their susceptibility to these triggers is largely determined by their social environment; and the process of recovery requires changes in personal and social identity which can be a barrier to recovery for some users. ConclusionThese findings present the concept of recovery triggers and highlight the role of wider risk environments in determining methamphetamine recovery, and the negative potential of social capital. These themes also address the ongoing debate regarding the agency of drug users, and the impact of this debate on drug user’s experiences of recovery.