Abstract

Lecture capture tends to polarise the views of academic staff. Some view it as encouraging non-attendance at lectures. Others view it as a valuable adjunct, allowing students to revisit the lecture experience and providing opportunities for clarification and repetition of key points. However, data supporting either of these stances remains scarce. Irrespective of these views, a more pertinent question pertains to the impact of lecture attendance and the use of recordings on student achievement. Findings remain unclear due to methodological issues, inconsistent findings, and a lack of differentiation of students by year of study. This paper investigated the impact of attendance, lecture recording, and student attainment across four years of an undergraduate programme. For first year students, attendance and recording use were positive predictors of performance. For weaker students, supplementary recording use was beneficial but only better students use of the recordings helped overcome the impact of low attendance. For second year students, attendance and recording use were positively correlated with, but no longer predictive of, achievement. There was no relationship for honours year students. We found no compelling evidence for a negative effect of recording use, or that attendance and recording use were related. We suggest focusing on improving lecture attendance through monitoring whilst also providing recordings for supplementary use, particularly in first year. Finally, our findings highlight the need to consider third variables such as year of study and first language when conducting and comparing lecture capture research.

Highlights

  • Lecture capture software has been used to deliver content for online courses, but it is commonplace for campus-based programmes to record live lectures

  • The course was composed of three sub-courses with three one-hour lectures per week running for 11 weeks with content from three different fields of psychology, with each sub-course taught by different lecturers

  • Again attendance and recording use were positively correlated with exam performance the addition of these variables did not improve the regression model

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Lecture capture software has been used to deliver content for online courses, but it is commonplace for campus-based programmes to record live lectures. Technological advances mean that lecture capture may provide an alternative to attending the live lecture, and so we argue that the key question from a learner perspective is not whether providing recordings affects attendance but whether the provision of recordings influences student achievement. Previous findings on this question have been mixed, potentially due to methodological problems, and no study has yet addressed the question of whether there is variability in how students in different years of study utilise lecture recordings and if the impact on achievement changes over time

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call