Abstract

Recently, three major processes are taking place in the urban space of the capital: 1) the process of national transonymization, ie the implementation of the names of newly established, renamed objects on the memorial principle (including national memoranda); 2) historical and cultural process; that is, the reproduction of object names in the nature of a national cultural symbol; 3) the process of national toponymization, ie the acquisition of common nouns. The main purpose of the article is to reveal and identify the Turkic basis of the layer of onyms formed as a result of this process of toponymization – one of the most productive internal resource development in the urban space of the capital. That is, by conducting an etymological analysis of the system of urbanonymy, to show that the main source of optimized units belongs to the group of Turkic languages. In the process of toponymization in the space of urbanism of the capital, the share of internal resource development is predominant, ie most of the layer of onyms on its onomastic map was formed as a result of the Turkic basis. As a result, the urban design of the capital of Kazakhstan has become the only historical and cultural center that meets the principles of language policy and naming / renaming of the Republic of Kazakhstan. And we understand that the definition of the layer of onyms in the laws of naming the internal objects of the city will be revealed in more depth by conducting a diachronic study of them.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call