Abstract

The drift velocity U0 at the interface between two homogeneous turbulent fluids of arbitrary relative densities in differential mean motion is considered. It is shown that an analytical expression for U0 follows from the classical scaling for these flows when the scaling is supplemented by standard turbulent universality and symmetry assumptions. This predicted U0 is the weighted mean of the free-stream velocities in each fluid, where the weighting factors are the square roots of the densities of the two fluids, normalized by their sum. For fluids of nearly equal densities, this weighted mean reduces to the simple mean of the free-stream velocities. For fluids of two widely differing densities, such as air overlying water, the result gives U0 ≈ αV∞, where α ≪ 1 is the square root of the ratio of the fluid densities, V∞ is the free-stream velocity of the overlying fluid, and the denser fluid is assumed nearly stationary. Comparisons with two classical laboratory experiments for fluids in these two limits and with previous numerical simulations of flow near a gas–liquid interface provide specific illustrations of the result. Solutions of a classical analytical model formulated to reproduce the air–water laboratory flow reveal compensating departures from the universality prediction, of order 15% in α, including a correction that is logarithmic in the ratio of dimensionless air and water roughness lengths. Solutions reproducing the numerical simulations illustrate that the logarithmic correction can arise from asymmetry in the dimensionless laminar viscous sublayers.

Highlights

  • The flow adjacent to an interface between two homogeneous, turbulent fluids is a classical topic in fluid dynamics, which continues to stimulate current research because of its importance in a wide range of environmental and engineering contexts.1–7 One aspect of this problem is the determination of the drift velocity: the mean interface-parallel motion at the interface

  • While the analytical result for the drift velocity is exact under the universality and symmetry assumptions, it is important to recognize that those assumptions will be violated to some degree in any physical fluid system, and the result must be understood only to provide a starting point for further, more complete analysis

  • The universality prediction suggestively reproduces a long-standing empirical rule for the ocean wind drift that was reported already more than half a century ago16,17 and is still in operational use,18 according to which the surface drift current speed is ∼3% of the wind speed

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The flow adjacent to an interface between two homogeneous, turbulent fluids is a classical topic in fluid dynamics, which continues to stimulate current research because of its importance in a wide range of environmental and engineering contexts. One aspect of this problem is the determination of the drift velocity: the mean interface-parallel motion at the interface. The flow adjacent to an interface between two homogeneous, turbulent fluids is a classical topic in fluid dynamics, which continues to stimulate current research because of its importance in a wide range of environmental and engineering contexts.1–7 One aspect of this problem is the determination of the drift velocity: the mean interface-parallel motion at the interface. While the analytical result for the drift velocity is exact under the universality and symmetry assumptions, it is important to recognize that those assumptions will be violated to some degree in any physical fluid system, and the result must be understood only to provide a starting point for further, more complete analysis This is true for flows supporting significant interfacial wave activity, the complex effects of which on flow near the interface are themselves a focus of much current research.. Air velocity (perhaps above a wave boundary layer21,22) is generally regarded as well-enough known that more recent laboratory studies generally measure the velocity profile only in the water and primarily focus instead on wave-state effects. The result is compared with a pioneering numerical study of coupled gas–liquid flow, which is conducted in a symmetric, dimensionless setting that anticipates the development by which the drift velocity prediction is obtained.

UNIVERSALITY RESULT
Freshwater–saltwater
Air–water
General considerations
Corrections for the Wu20 air–water flow
Findings
SUMMARY
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.