Abstract

With current concerns around global climate change, new hydrofluorocarbons with low Global Warming Potential (GWP) are being evaluated as alternative refrigerants. These alternative refrigerants, however, may be mildly flammable (as defined by the A2L safety group classification) and pose safety concerns for the heating, ventilation, air conditioning, and refrigeration (HVAC/R) industry. Consequently, careful assessments of different flammability characteristics and risks for these refrigerants are essential for their safe use in actual applications. In this study, deflagration propagation measurements for different mildly flammable refrigerants, including difluoromethane (R-32) and 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene (R-1234yf), were undertaken in different geometries including a 9.1-m long conduit test rig and a closed cubical 12.5 m3 volume. Different tests were conducted for full volume deflagrations as well as with and without obstructions. Turbulent deflagration speeds for well-mixed, refrigerant-air mixtures have been shown to be orders of magnitude larger than their corresponding laminar flame speed values that are used in classifying flammable refrigerants in safety standards. Testing has also quantified the resulting severity as measured by the event overpressure which was shown to worsen with increased congestion or confinement as a consequence of increased induced turbulence. This work illustrates the importance for severity evaluations for actual large-scale or congested geometries of concern in practical applications. Even for mildly flammable refrigerants characterized by laminar flame speeds <2 cm/s, which is lower than the 10 cm/s limit for A2L refrigerants, relatively fast deflagrations can be generated for very congested geometries where downstream turbulence is generated as the flame front passes over obstacles in these situations.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call