Abstract

Cyclonic fields are important for cyclonic static microbubble flotation columns (FCSMCs), one of the most important developments in column flotation technology, particularly for separation of fine particles, where the internal flow field has enormous influence on flotation performance. PIV (particle image velocimetry) and CFD (computational fluid dynamics) are the most effective methods to study flow fields. However, data is insufficient for FCSMC flow fields and similar cyclonic equipment, with turbulence model simulations producing different views to measured data. This paper employs an endoscope and PIV to measure axial and cross sections for single-phase swirling flow fields in FCSMCs. We then compare various turbulence model simulations (Reynolds stress model (RSM), standard k-ε, realizable k-ε, and RNG (renormalization group) k-ε) to the measured data. The RSM (Reynolds stress model) predicts cyclonic flow field best in flotation columns with 16.22% average relative velocity deviation. Although the realizable k-ε model has less than 30% relative deviation in radial and tangential directions, axial deviations reach 78.11%. Standard k-ε and RNG k-ε models exhibited approximately 40% and 30% radial and tangential deviation, respectively, and cannot be used even for trend predictions for axial velocity. k-ε models are based on isotropic assumptions with semi-empirical formulas summarized from experiments, whereas RSM fundamentally considers laminar flow and Reynolds stress, and hence is more suitable for anisotropic performance. This study will contribute to flotation column and other cyclonic flow field equipment research.

Highlights

  • Cyclonic structures are employed in cyclonic static microbubble flotation columns (FCSMCs), which have sprung up since it was patented in 1999 [1] and been successfully applied to refining stages, to facilitate centrifugal separation [2], bubble dispersion [3], and the reduction of sorting granularity [4].Figure 1 shows a typical FCSMC structure, incorporating an inverted cone in its middle part

  • This study will contribute to flotation column and other cyclonic flow field equipment research

  • Wang et al [10] compared single-phase Particle image velocimetry (PIV) experiment results with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) predictions, and concluded that the Reynolds stress model (RSM) model was more suitable for single-phase cyclonic field simulation in a FCSMC

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cyclonic structures are employed in cyclonic static microbubble flotation columns (FCSMCs), which have sprung up since it was patented in 1999 [1] and been successfully applied to refining stages, to facilitate centrifugal separation [2], bubble dispersion [3], and the reduction of sorting granularity [4]. Wang et al [10] compared single-phase PIV experiment results with CFD predictions, and concluded that the RSM model was more suitable for single-phase cyclonic field simulation in a FCSMC. Two main problems have prevented flow field application to cyclonic flotation columns: Measured data is not available for the tangential section and turbulent numerical models remain uncertain. The current study first improved the traditional PIV experimental method for flotation columns, and developed an experimental platform for measuring the swirling field axial and cross sections inside a flotation column, providing detailed flow field information including axial, radial and tangential velocity. This study provides a new reference for numerical studies and PIV tests on flotation columns and similar equipment flow fields

Experiment Apparatus
Experiment Method
Turbulence Models
Geometry and Mesh
Boundary
Quantitative Analysis
Axial velocity distribution turbulencemodels models and measurement
Findings
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.