Abstract
ABSTRACTGreenland turbot fillet sections were baked in conventional and microwave ovens. The microwave oven cooked the fish faster, required less energy, and demonstrated greater relative efficiency than did the conventional oven. Solid‐drip and total cooking losses were greater and Kramer shear values and evaporative loss were lower for microwave‐heated fish. No differences in sensory flakiness and moisture were found between oven treatments, but microwave‐heated samples were rated softer and less chewy by a trained panel. Several significant correlations were found among sensory attributes and objective measures of quality. A 39‐member consumer panel indicated no differences in acceptability of turbot heated by the two cooking methods.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
