Abstract
Interest continues to build in tunnel ventilation as a method of enhancing broiler performance and reducing mortality during warm weather. The perception that operating costs associated with this system may be high has caused concern. The purpose of this study was to collect and compare broiler performance data and operating costs of conventional and tunnel-ventilated broiler houses on a commercial broiler farm. Daily high temperatures during the study averaged 93°F (36°C). Typically, house temperatures were reduced 2 to 4°F (1 to 2°C) in the conventional house and 7 to 12°F (4 to 7°C) in the tunnel-ventilated house. Body weights at 55 days averaged 5.35 lbs. (2.43 kg) in the tunnel-ventilated house and 5.13 lbs. (2.33 kg) in the conventional house. Feed conversion was 2.03 and 2.05 in the tunnel-ventilated and conventional houses, respectively. Livability was essentially the same in both houses. Electricity costs over the entire growout in the tunnel-ventilated houses were nearly double those of the conventional house; however, these costs were only 20 to 30% higher on hot days. Fogging system water usage in the tunnel-ventilated house was more than twice that of the conventional house. Overall, the value of the enhanced performance of the broilers in the tunnel-ventilated house slightly offset the additional operating costs.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.