Tunnel Lining Crack Recognition Algorithm Integrating SK Attention and Cascade Neural Network

Abstract

Cracks are one of the main types of tunnel-lining defects. At present, there are no particularly good methods for identifying tunnel-lining cracks. The methods that are used are associated with problems such as poor robustness, low detection efficiency, and inconsistency in defect identification. Vision-based crack identification algorithms that use images of tunnel-lining cracks are also affected by problems such as weak features, irregular shapes, random development, and small proportions. In light of this, we propose in this paper a neural network that integrates U-net and FPN (feature pyramid network) pyramid structure characteristics. Because of its ability to output deep feature information, an SK (selective kernel) attention mechanism was integrated to increase the weight of effective feature regions and improve the detection accuracy of feature maps. An RPN (region proposal network) regional detection network was used for multi-scale regional screening, and non-maximum suppression was used to eliminate repeated anchor frames between different regions. The continuity of cracks was determined using adaptive regional expansion. The region segmentation network was also combined with multi-scale feature maps. Finally, the segmentation results for regions of fine features could be mapped to the whole image to identify cracks, thereby solving the problem that arises when textural features of cracks are weak and cannot be accurately identified. For testing purposes, photos of tunnel-lining crack defects were used. The algorithm described in this paper was able to combine deep and shallow features to identify more abundant crack features, and the recognition accuracy of the crack classification network reached 98.51%. With respect to crack segmentation, the algorithm’s segmentation accuracy reached 94.55%, and its single processing time reached 60.76 ms, indicating more accurate and efficient segmentation performance, compared with FCNs (fully convolutional networks) and classical U-net networks.