Abstract

In contrast with conventional single-molecule junctions, in which the current flows parallel to the long axis or plane of a molecule, we investigate the transport properties of M(II)-5,15-diphenylporphyrin (M-DPP) single-molecule junctions (M=Co, Ni, Cu, or Zn divalent metal ions), in which the current flows perpendicular to the plane of the porphyrin. Novel STM-based conductance measurements combined with quantum transport calculations demonstrate that current-perpendicular-to-the-plane (CPP) junctions have three-orders-of-magnitude higher electrical conductances than their current-in-plane (CIP) counterparts, ranging from 2.10−2 G0 for Ni-DPP up to 8.10−2 G0 for Zn-DPP. The metal ion in the center of the DPP skeletons is strongly coordinated with the nitrogens of the pyridyl coated electrodes, with a binding energy that is sensitive to the choice of metal ion. We find that the binding energies of Zn-DPP and Co-DPP are significantly higher than those of Ni-DPP and Cu-DPP. Therefore when combined with its higher conductance, we identify Zn-DPP as the favoured candidate for high-conductance CPP single-molecule devices.

Highlights

  • Porphyrins offer a variety of desirable features as building blocks for future molecular-scale devices including their highly-conjugated structure, rigid planar geometry, high chemical stability and their ability to form metalloporphyrins by coordinating metal ions in the center of their macrocyclic and aromatic skeleton[1,2,3,4,5]

  • For all four metallo-porphyrins, we find that the energetically-most-favorable configuration occurs when the PY nitrogen atoms are located above the metal atom of the porphyrin

  • We have investigated the electrical conductance with the current perpendicular to the plane (CPP) of supramolecular metalloporphyrin wires

Read more

Summary

EB eV

Extension of previous experimental measurement[21] which showed that the CPP conductance of the flat-laying sandwiches of a Co(II)-DPP shows a large conductance value of three orders of magnitude higher than the measured in-plane conductance[10]

Results and Discussion
Conclusion
Additional Information
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call