Tuning photophysical properties with ancillary ligands in Ru(II) mono-diimine complexes

Abstract

The series of complexes [XRu(CO)(L–L)(L′) 2][PF 6] (X = H, TFA, Cl; L–L = 2,2′-bipyridyl, 1,10-phenanthroline, 5-amino-1,10-phenanthroline and 4,4′-dicarboxylic-2,2′-bipyridyl; L′ 2 = 2PPh 3, Ph 2PC 2H 4PPh 2, Ph 2PCH CHPPh 2) have been synthesized from the starting complex K[Ru(CO) 3(TFA) 3] (TFA = CF 3CO 2) by first reacting with the phosphine ligand, followed by reaction with the L–L and anion exchange with NaPF 6. In the case of L–L = phenanthroline and L′ 2 = 2PPh 3, the neutral complex Ru(Ph 3P)(CO)(1,10-phenanthroline)(TFA) 2 is also obtained and its solid state structure is reported. Solid state structures are also reported for the cationic complexes where L–L = phenanthroline, L 2 = 2PPh 3 and X = Cl and for L–L = 2,2′-bipyridyl, L 2 = 2PPh 3 and X = H. All the complexes were characterized in solution by a combination of 1H and 31P NMR, IR, mass spectrometry and elemental analyses. The purpose of the project was to synthesize a series of complexes that exhibit a range of excited-state lifetimes and that have large Stokes shifts, high quantum yields and high intrinsic polarizations associated with their metal-to-ligand charge-transfer (MLCT) emissions. To a large degree these goals have been realized in that excited-state lifetimes in the range of 100 ns to over 1 μs are observed. The lifetimes are sensitive to both solvent and the presence of oxygen. The measured quantum yields and intrinsic anisotropies are higher than for previously reported Ru(II) complexes. Interestingly, the neutral complex with one phosphine ligand shows no MLCT emission. Under the conditions of synthesis some of the initially formed complexes with X = TFA are converted to the corresponding hydrides or in the presence of chlorinated solvents to the corresponding chlorides, testifying to the lability of the TFA Ligand. The compounds show multiple reduction potentials which are chemically and electrochemically reversible in a few cases as examined by cyclic voltammetry. The relationships between the observed photophysical properties of the complexes and the nature of the ligands on the Ru(II) is discussed.